Sample Report — Fictional Data. All supplier names, codes, findings, and signals on this page are entirely fictional and are provided for demonstration purposes only. No real supplier is represented. Start a real assessment →
China Supplier Risk Assessment — Sample Report
Shenzhen Bright Future Electronics Co., Ltd.
深圳亮未来电子有限公司
Do Not Engage
Multiple adverse litigation signals and registry inconsistencies present material fraud and performance risk.
Risk Score
76 / 100
Risk Level
High
Confidence
High
USCC Status
Mismatch
Executive Summary
Shenzhen Bright Future Electronics Co., Ltd. presents a HIGH risk profile driven by three active court enforcement orders, a material USCC registry name mismatch, and a domain with a registration date inconsistent with the claimed operational history. Despite no sanctions matches, the combination of litigation exposure and identity verification failure warrants disengagement.
Risk Dimensions — 7 of 7
Three active enforcement records (执行) identified in the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System. Two cases involve unpaid commercial obligations to domestic suppliers. One case is still active.
Subject entity had its export license suspended for 90 days in 2023 according to a customs administration public notice. License was reinstated but the event was not disclosed.
Business license shows a different company name variant from the USCC registry entry. Registered capital was reduced from ¥5M to ¥1M in 2024 with no public explanation.
Domain brightfutureelec.com was registered approximately 4 months prior to the engagement request. Limited third-party B2B platform presence, no verifiable trade directory listings.
Submitted business license shows formatting inconsistencies: QR code verification returns a different entity name. License expiry date appears manually altered.
No verifiable export history on public customs data sources. No third-party platform reviews from confirmed international buyers. Claimed ISO 9001 certificate number does not appear in the TÜV certification database.
Two negative media mentions: one in a Chinese-language B2B fraud warning forum, one in a procurement community thread describing delayed delivery and non-response after payment.
Signal Evidence (8 signals)
3 active enforcement records identified on the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS). Enforcement amounts total approximately ¥420,000. All cases involve unpaid commercial debts to domestic counterparts.
Provided USCC code 91440300MA5GXR4L2X resolves to 'Shenzhen Bright Future Technology Co., Ltd.' in the official registry. The submitted name 'Shenzhen Bright Future Electronics Co., Ltd.' does not match. This discrepancy is a common indicator of identity substitution.
QR code on submitted business license resolves to a different entity (Shenzhen Bright Future Technology Co., Ltd.). Expiry date on the physical document appears inconsistent with the digital record. Document rejected as unverified.
Customs administration public notice dated March 2023 shows a 90-day suspension of export license for the subject entity. License was reinstated June 2023. Event was not disclosed in the engagement request.
Domain brightfutureelec.com was registered on 2024-11-18 (WHOIS). Supplier claims 8 years of operational history, which is inconsistent with the domain age. No cached prior domain history found.
OpenSanctions cross-reference (80+ source lists including OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, UN Security Council, HM Treasury) returned no direct or probable matches for the subject entity or its legal representative.
Two negative references found: one in a procurement fraud warning forum (2024-Q3), one in an English-language sourcing community thread describing payment loss after advance wire transfer. Both reference a company matching the subject name and product category.
No export shipments found on public customs intelligence sources for the subject entity. No verified B2B platform reviews from international buyers. Claimed ISO 9001 certificate CN/2022/48291 not found in TÜV or SGS databases.
Sanctions & PEP Screening
CLEAR — No matches detected
OpenSanctions cross-reference across 80+ lists (OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, UN Security Council, HM Treasury, PEP databases) returned no direct or probable matches.
Trade Compliance
MEDIUM RISKHS Code Not Provided
Without a confirmed HS code, applicable export control classifications (EAR, CCL) cannot be verified. Electronics components above certain thresholds may require export licenses.
Dual-Use Technology Screening Pending
Product category (electronics components) requires manual screening for dual-use classification under EU Regulation 2021/821 and US EAR Part 774.
Recommended Actions
Do not proceed with payment or contract signing
Active litigation exposure, document authenticity failure, and registry mismatch together constitute a high-probability fraud risk.
Request independent USCC verification before any contact
Obtain official company extract from the SAMR registry to confirm legal identity. Do not rely on documents provided by the supplier.
Source alternative suppliers through verified channels
Given the adverse profile, alternative verified suppliers in the same product category should be identified before the procurement timeline is compromised.
USCC Registry Verification
MISMATCH
Code: 91440300MA5GXR4L2X
Mismatch — registry name does not match provided name
Ready for Real Analysis?
Run This Assessment on Your Supplier — $49
This was fictional data. The same structured analysis — all 7 dimensions, sanctions screening, USCC verification, document review — for the supplier you're actually sourcing from.
Start a Real Assessment →No subscription · Fixed fee · Confidential · Delivered to your secure portal